Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> From: Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> > Subject: Re: [Leica] PAWs Posted > > Nice portrait of that commie ;-) > > I'll tell him you said so, but he may prefer "pinko" >> From: Ric Carter <ricc@mindspring.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:48:40 -0400 >> To: <lug@leica-users.org> >> Cc: <petrblt@hotmail.com> >> Subject: [Leica] PAWs Posted >> >> Just posted weeks 27 & 28. >> >> There's an a and a b for week 28. I find one better pictorially and >> the other more engaging. >> >> Week 27 >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/PAW-2005/Week_27 >> Peter writes a column for a local lefty paper-The Independant. >> Artfully pissy attitude. > > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:09:45 -0400 > From: Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Leica] PAWs Posted > > Ric, > Thanks for showing your PAWs. Week 27 and 28b are good descriptive > portraits. I believe that 27 would be stronger if the upper right > side was brought down some. > Good idea, I'll give it a try. Thanks. > Week 28a leaves something out for me. I think what is bothering me is > I want a long row of live oaks like you see at that plantation north > of N.O. or the ones on Cumberland Island. I do appreciate the > distance you chose to show a person alone in nature. Possibly it > would work better if the taking position was a little to the right to > make the path move a little more diagonally in the image. What is > strange is that if done as a watercolor I would like it very much with > the dark greens and browns of the trees. So after all the rambling, > it is a good image, this viewer is just bringing personal baggage to > the viewing. Afraid we don't grow them that way here, a bit far north I guess. As a matter of fact, she's doing a watercolor. Thanks Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies