Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon
From: leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Fri Jul 1 18:46:29 2005
References: <BEEAFD6C.17A46%mark@rabinergroup.com>

You might also consider a used RB... they're even less pricey than 
the RZ and are purely mechanical.  (There are a couple of metered 
finders if you wish.)  

I had one years ago, until it was stolen,  and  since the prices have 
more or less collapsed, I recently replaced it for a fraction of what 
the original cost.  All's right with the world again.  Leicas, RB, 
Canons, and a 4x5 Busch for the occasional "meditations moment."



On 1 Jul 2005 at 18:14, Scott McLoughlin wrote:

> If I'm not mistaken, some of my favorite Ilford films come only
> in 120 now, not 220.  I can always pick up a 220 back should I
> discover some films that I like for MF shooting.
--


R. Clayton McKee                               www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist                            rcmckee@rcmckee.com
P O Box 571900                      voice/fax   713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900                  dig pager  281/510-3588


Replies: Reply from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)
Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)