Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thoughts on the ZI rangefinder
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Wed Jun 29 11:30:48 2005
References: <BEE819BD.2189%bdcolen@comcast.net> <a0611040ebee8638884b4@172.16.1.34> <ceb1a56505062911034588a548@mail.gmail.com>

To me there are quality criteria (including things like price, 
availability,
service, MTBF, repair network, etc.), the products, and how well the
products meet the criteria. That's pretty much it.

Mark Langer wrote:

>I'm with Gene on this.  Debates about "true" pedigrees are reminscent
>of those concerning whether the Leicas made in Portugal or Canada are
>real Leicas, or whether Solms is as authentic as Wetzlar, or (to apply
>it to other marques) to whether the Singapore Rolleis are worthy of
>the same name as the Germany Rolleis.  Are co-engineered cameras as
>  
>



In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Thoughts on the ZI rangefinder)
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Thoughts on the ZI rangefinder)