[Leica] new Puts article

[abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)]

I don't understand this, Henning. 

It seems to me that the depth of field is solely a fuction of the
geometry of the lens/film system. That the print and enlargement has
nothing to do with it.

If I took an R8 with a 50 shot wide open at f1.4 I'd get some depth of
field. I replace the back with the DMR. Same shot. Same depth of field
but cropped.

So then I open the images on photoshop and look at them. How does the
depth of field change?

So I'm confused but I could certainly be enlightened! :)

Adam

On 6/27/05, Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> wrote:
> Since the image of the 50 on APS has to be enlarged more, the final
> CoC on the print will be larger, so that, conversely, means that the
> DOF of a 50 at any given f-stop will be less for a same size print
> than the DOF on a full size sensor/film.
> 
> --
>     *            Henning J. Wulff