Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] new Puts article
From: mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Sat Jun 25 15:51:11 2005

Is this true? Since you have to enlarge a cropped version more won't the
circle of confusion come into play - i.e. the depth of field will reside
some where between the 35mm and 1.5 version.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of B. D. Colen
Sent: 25 June 2005 19:51
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] new Puts article


Nope. The depth of field is indeed independent of the crop - it's the
same as the "real" focal length of the lens. But that means that when
you shoot with a 35 mm lens with a 1.5 crop factor, you are getting an
image that looks like you shot it with a 52 mm lens, but with the depth
of field of a 35. So your 50 1.4 becomes a 75 1.4, but with the depth of
field of a 50 1.4
- which actually is probably an advantage in that case. :-)

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date: 24/06/2005
 


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] new Puts article)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] new Puts article)