Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji Super HQ 200?
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Jun 15 13:02:48 2005
References: <001f01c571fc$cc0bcd70$91d1f6cd@IBMA484DF758F7>

Fuji film generally has good reputation. I usually shoot only Fuji slides 
(and now) B&W, but if I need to shoot ASA800 or 1600 in color film, I 
always turn to the Fuji Superior (?) 800/1600 and they work quite well. 
Don't think it matters in your case, but they suppose to have a separate 
layer so that the color response for mixed lighting supposes to be very good.

At 03:51 PM 6/15/2005, Steve Ries wrote:

>I would appreciate opinions regarding Fuji Super HQ 200. I have been away 
>from photography for about ten years and I am looking for a good basic 
>film for landscape and architecture.
>
>I will be using an F3 and hopefully my old ZI Contax III if it still woks. 
>Leica will follow if the RF concept works for me. I did industrial 
>photography work professionally for about 5 years out of school using Fuji 
>chromes.
>
>Many thanks,
>Steve

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


In reply to: Message from sries333 at eticomm.net (Steve Ries) ([Leica] Fuji Super HQ 200?)