Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices)
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Thu Jun 9 14:31:52 2005

Thanks for your opinion Gene, I thaught that Nokton was better...

Saludos cordiales,
Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de
Grduprey@aol.com
Enviado el: jueves, 09 de junio de 2005 4:53
Para: lug@leica-users.org
Asunto: Re: [Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices)

In a message dated 6/8/2005 5:09:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
luisripoll@telefonica.net writes:
but I ask me seriously if it is not better expend
about 400 $ on a Nokton than 300 Euro on a CLA, which are your opinions?


Well, if the 40 Nokton flares as badly as the 35 Ultron does, I'll take the
Pre-Asph 35 'Lux any day.  My 35 Ultron is pretty bad in the flare
department,
and my Pre- asph 'Lux is nowhere near as bad in the flare department.
Personnaly my experience with the CV 35 Ultron is not too good.

Gene

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from Grduprey at aol.com (Grduprey@aol.com) ([Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices))