Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for your opinion Gene, I thaught that Nokton was better... Saludos cordiales, Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Grduprey@aol.com Enviado el: jueves, 09 de junio de 2005 4:53 Para: lug@leica-users.org Asunto: Re: [Leica] Re: Voigtlander 40/1.4 (was Leica prices) In a message dated 6/8/2005 5:09:42 PM Central Daylight Time, luisripoll@telefonica.net writes: but I ask me seriously if it is not better expend about 400 $ on a Nokton than 300 Euro on a CLA, which are your opinions? Well, if the 40 Nokton flares as badly as the 35 Ultron does, I'll take the Pre-Asph 35 'Lux any day. My 35 Ultron is pretty bad in the flare department, and my Pre- asph 'Lux is nowhere near as bad in the flare department. Personnaly my experience with the CV 35 Ultron is not too good. Gene _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information