Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75 'cron & Leica's inventory revaluation
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Mon Jun 6 11:55:15 2005
References: <BECA06ED.1172%bdcolen@comcast.net>

It's not so much that they haven't changed dramatically since 1954, 
it's that they
are priced almost twice as high as they should be!
;-)

feli

On Jun 6, 2005, at 10:58 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> The alleged infusion of capital is to come from the sale of 
> stock...Makes
> sense - after having your stock price drop through the floor, have your
> survival depend upon selling $25 million worth of new stock - but first
> raise your prices so that investors can see they are buying into a 
> company
> that thinks it can stay afloat by selling rangefinder film cameras
> essentially unchanged since 1954 for $3200 a pop! Good sound business 
> model.
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


no archive


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 75 'cron & Leica's inventory revaluation)
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:75 'cron & Leica's inventory revaluation)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] 75 'cron & Leica's inventory revaluation)