Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Jun 4 22:19:44 2005
References: <BEC75F39.1643B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <d412adfe892983ce66f7ea5b5426f8a6@singnet.com.sg> <a06001094bec80e2e88bf@gpsy.com>

Well said!

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Jun 4, 2005, at 7:10 PM, Karen Nakamura wrote:

>
> I think we are reaching the point where the evolution of sensor  
> design is plateauing and we are seeing only minimal differences  
> between different platforms. And I think this is a good thing  
> because it forces us to return to the original question of how we  
> choose cameras.
>
> Remember that even in 2000, we could have chosen to use a Canon EOS  
> 1 film body with Leica glass with an adapter. And guess what -- the  
> photos would have been identical.
>
> We used to chose film bodies either because of the compatibility of  
> the glass we put on it, or because of the body features, not  
> because one body takes better photographs than another one.  I.e.,  
> a Canon EOS Rebel could take an identically good photograph as a  
> Canon EOS 1v with the same glass. We chose the EOS 1v because of  
> its superior environmental sealing, the eyepiece shutter, build  
> quality, reliability, etc.
>
> The EOS 20D is a fine camera but the base body is mid-consumer  
> level. It's not even the equivalent of the film based EOS-3.  The  
> body will last 3-5 years, but not 5-10 and certainly not for very  
> long in demanding environments.
>
> I predict we'll start to begin choosing our digital bodies based on  
> factors other than sensor density and  image quality.  The reason  
> you should chose the R9/DMR over the EOS-20D will become the same  
> reason you chose the R8 over the EOS-5 ten years ago. Not because  
> of the superior "film" since the film was the same, but because the  
> ergonomics and other mechanics were better.
>
> Karen
>
> -- 
> Karen Nakamura
> http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
> http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)