Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Thu Jun 2 23:57:44 2005
References: <000401c567c8$2c3cf640$5540e344@newukolbqveo9i> <a0600100abec551b65c51@gpsy .com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050602180757.05ebf890@192.168.100.42> <a06001010bec576f41 71d@gpsy.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050602224328.05edb7c0@192.168.100.42> <a06001002bec5aaa4343b@gpsy.com>

At 11:37 PM 6/2/2005, you wrote:


>>Thanks. I actually do know the Emishi are different from the 
>>Untouchables. I didn't know there are two untouchable classes though. The 
>>confusion came in my English structure. Should the comma be there or not?
>>
>>Emishi, or (also) the Untouchables
>>or
>>Emishi or (also) the Untouchables
>>?
>
>Err....  The emishi have nothing to do with the former  outcaste groups at 
>all.  I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The emishi don't exist in 
>the current moment.   They were forced out over a thousand years ago, it's 
>kind of hard to take photos of them.

That's what I am saying, I understand they have nothing to do with the 
outcast groups.

Interesting. I thought there are still Emishi in the Hokkaido island, but I 
am probably wrong again :-) Anyway, thanks for all the explanations.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)