Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Too much inventory
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Thu Jun 2 16:25:25 2005

August at the earliest.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of GREG
LORENZO
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:48 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Too much inventory


This Zeiss camera does not exist yet. Looks like you'll both have some
time to save for it. Now due out sometime this summer.

Regards,

Greg 

----- Original Message -----
From: Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com>
Date: Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Leica] Too much inventory

> Damn straight.
> 
> I've already got 2 M6's. If the AE bug really gets to me, a ZI or
> R2/3ais probably in my future rather than an M7. CV's have a 
> shorter RF base
> length, but the 1:1 on the R3a is intruiguing and I find the CV VF 
> on my R
> a little brighter than those on my M6's. The ZI's have a longer RF 
> baselength.
> 
> Lense wise, I have a 50/1.4 ASPH lust, but I can find the strength to 
> resist.  My Nokton is doing me just fine for nearly 1/10 the price. 
> Otherwise my 50mm lusts tend toward Leica gear I can easily find used.

> I'm set for the 21, 28 and 90 FL's.
> 
> I may come around to replacing my CV 35/2.5P LTM. Can't find a 
> suitable vented hood for the thing.  Here a Zeiss 35/2 would probably 
> do the trick quite nicely.
> 
> I hope ZI does well in the marketplace. Over time might help to
> rationalizeLeica's pricing a bit.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> Dennis Painter wrote:
> 
> >That is making this look pretty good: 
> >http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/ContentsWWWIntern/5FCF6DFD7DA96
> >A31C1256F7000680C3E
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/b4rex
> >
> >Jeffery Smith wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Yep, the M cameras will go up to the low $3K area.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Too much inventory)