Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yep, it has a lot to do with "purchasing power parity" in the post-war economy. A camera for which you probably couldn't get much film was tradable for something apparently more valuable - $20 worth of cigarettes, probably 2,500 cigarettes in total. Cigarettes had a value either collectively or singly, so it wasn't such a bad deal if what you wanted to do was trade for food fort you and your family. Shame about the lung cancer though... It was the intersection of two very different worlds. For the victors, they could get most things easily especially if you were a GI. For the vanquished it was a completely different world. Peter Dzwig Gary Todoroff wrote: > In 1968, 18 cents was equal to today's dollar, representing over five times > inflation since then. That "cheap" M4 at $600 was over $3000 in today's > currency (see: http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/pol_sci/fac/sahr/cv2005.pdf for > inflation factors). > > Leica's have stayed about the same price over almost forty years - it's > just > the other camera's that have become much less expensive! > > Gary Todoroff > > -----Original Message-----