Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Nikon D2X review now PS BS
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed May 11 11:51:33 2005
References: <20050510205217.80922.qmail@web52603.mail.yahoo.com><428188E1.5030003@edd.uio.no> <p0621020cbea747c08f71@10.4.1.193><007801c555f7$93e1a990$3201a8c0@AUG01><4cfa589b050511084651929c5f@mail.gmail.com> <33034.81.233.210.109.1115834097.squirrel@webmail.uio.no>
 
Starting to sound like a monopoly to me.

"Well, I shot my 36mp Nikon/Canon 4D v.2 all on DNG, but I did not buy the
$300 upgrade for PS so I can't view the images....)

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Ridings"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon D2X review


> So ... we use Adobe's utility to convert our files to a file that their
> application can read.
>
> Then we add layers, make adjustments ... and save them in a proprietary
> format, PSD? Or do they plan to publish the specifications for PSD-format
> so that we can save our digital negatives with all the layers (in case we
> want to make changes later)?
>
> I'm just curious. Seriously. Are they going to make DNG the native format
> for saving Photoshop files and abandon their own PSD format? That would be
> great.
>
> Daniel
Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Re:Nikon D2X review now PS BS)
 In reply to: Message from patrick at photo.net (Patrick (Washington, DC)) ([Leica] Nikon D2X review)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Nikon D2X review)
Message from ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben) ([Leica] Nikon D2X review)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Nikon D2X review)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Nikon D2X review)