Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used
From: brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly)
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:20:00 2005
References: <BE91D7B4.13FB3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <c792ee633a422e758b8f34adaf0f5b48@earthlink.net> <12493c12635e81e553ca25ccec54b180@bradbrad.com> <71486517dd75ef7e8be8ca5b46aa0b5b@earthlink.net>

i'm probably wrong.  i was going on a description of the camera.

i've managed to miss every single installment of the series in the 
guardian, at least the online version.

--brad

On 25 Apr 2005, at 6:17 PM, Feli wrote:

> There has been a running series on the project in the Guardian for the 
> past few months.
> They specifically mention the 645, but perhaps he is using both?

--
brad daly       
brad@bradbrad.com
http://www.bradbrad.com

What Would Bill Hicks Say?

"I was so much older then / I'm younger than that now."
        --Bob Dylan


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)