Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used
From: brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly)
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:20:00 2005
References: <BE91D7B4.13FB3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <c792ee633a422e758b8f34adaf0f5b48@earthlink.net> <12493c12635e81e553ca25ccec54b180@bradbrad.com> <71486517dd75ef7e8be8ca5b46aa0b5b@earthlink.net>
i'm probably wrong. i was going on a description of the camera.
i've managed to miss every single installment of the series in the
guardian, at least the online version.
--brad
On 25 Apr 2005, at 6:17 PM, Feli wrote:
> There has been a running series on the project in the Guardian for the
> past few months.
> They specifically mention the 645, but perhaps he is using both?
--
brad daly
brad@bradbrad.com
http://www.bradbrad.com
What Would Bill Hicks Say?
"I was so much older then / I'm younger than that now."
--Bob Dylan
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)