Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Mon Apr 25 16:17:06 2005
References: <BE91D7B4.13FB3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <c792ee633a422e758b8f34adaf0f5b48@earthlink.net> <12493c12635e81e553ca25ccec54b180@bradbrad.com>
On Apr 25, 2005, at 3:59 PM, brad daly wrote:
> from the description of his cameras in the new yorker story, it seemed
> clear to me they were 67s.
There has been a running series on the project in the Guardian for the
past few months.
They specifically mention the 645, but perhaps he is using both?
feli
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4
www.elanphotos.com
Replies:
Reply from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)