Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Innovation Not!
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Sun Apr 24 17:02:58 2005
References: <cf.273ed798.2f9c672e@aol.com>

Comments to hits:  a frustrating business.  I've 
taken to being consoled by the hits counter - at 
least people are looking.

A genuine reaction is really appreciated; an actual discussion, treasured.

>
>In a message dated 4/23/2005 9:33:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
>mark@rabinergroup.com writes:
>
>Lets  just see the shots!
>Have we seen any at all?
>
>
>I keep sending them. Whiz! here's a shot! digital, M6, CLE , Digital *ist, 
>all sorts of stuff.  Sigh, I get about four reactions and 1000 views. go 
>figure. No one says, "WOW! how the F*** didja 
>get that shot?"  No one says,  "Ahem,
>is that a Leica shot?" 
>

(snip)

>
>Regards, 
>Sonny
>http://www.sonc.com
>Natchitoches, Louisiana
>Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
>?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Leica Innovation Not!)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Re: Leica Innovation Not!)