Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 369, digital M
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Mon Apr 11 05:57:38 2005
References: <20050411103606.21370.qmail@web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
 
I am not even going out on a limb here: not only will your D-2 not be 
upgradeable, neither will any digital M PERIOD.

John Collier

On 11-Apr-05, at 4:36 AM, Laurence John wrote:

> I believe that a Leica digital M also has to be "upgradeable" when new 
> technology (pixel no, type etc & internal software) becomes available. 
>  Why buy a such an "over-priced" camera that lasts at least 50 years, 
> when digital is so disposable?  It has to be able to have the "guts" 
> removed and replaced - then the outer skin can continue as long as we 
> like the RF format.  I have a Digilux 2 (which I love) and I hope that 
> may be upgradable too.
In reply to: Message from laurencejjohn at yahoo.co.uk (Laurence John) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 29, Issue 369, digital M)