Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica digital back-initial test results
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sun Apr 10 07:19:13 2005

IF it does behave like a somewhat lower res MF back; and IF it produces
the image quality the post says it does, then for professionals who NEED
the image quality, don't need or want autofocus, and who have a major
investment in R equipment, it may indeed be worth the cost. For anyone
else who needs to even think before writing a check, it's over priced.
Because given the uses to which most camera owners put their images, the
image quality difference will not be apparent. 

As to Leica not needing PR because the first year's miniscule production
run is sold out - it is a lack of good PR/Advertising/Marketing savvy -
and they are all inextricably intertwined - that is killing Leica.  



Replies: Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] leica digital back; now marketing will save Leica?)
Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] leica digital back-initial test results)
In reply to: Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] leica digital back-initial test results)