Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Is B.D. all wet again?
From: jcb at visualimpressions.com (JCB)
Date: Mon Apr 4 16:38:47 2005
References: <000301c5396d$a4378e50$6401a8c0@bigguy>

Hear hear !

Walt... you got it right!

JB


At 04:25 PM 4/4/2005, Walt Johnson wrote:
>Can't help it B.D., been dwelling  on a comment you made a while back. Was 
>gonna let it slide (sometimes it best to keep trap shut) but must respond.
>
>You mentioned how boring  the Ansel Adams genre was. I railed. I chomped 
>at the bit. I had steam coming out my ears. I kept my mouth shut.
>
>Sorry, but it's of no avail. Ansel was a man who set trends, not followed 
>them. Sure, there are lots of look -alikes out there today. 'I'm sure we 
>could uncover a lot of Gene Smith clones too. Hey, every time I turn 
>around there are folks emulating Robert Frank, William Klein and Mary 
>Ellen Mark.
>
>One thing is certain though, Ansel was an original. Sure, some of his 
>writing was a bit pedantic but he was an original. Artist, 
>environmentalist, and humanitarian.
>
>I help to  hang one of his shows in 1969 and was very sad not to be able 
>to have $75 dollars to buy a signed "Moonrise over Hernandez".  (that was 
>with the student discount)
>
>One Ansel is worth about 27 Maplethorpes. (sp) Hell, haven't used anything 
>other than a Nikon, Leica, or RB since school days but if I wanted to know 
>the ins and outies of a view cam I'd certainly look to Ansel's writings.
>
>Walt


In reply to: Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?)