Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's a very fine grained silver film. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Ridings Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:00 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji Neopan Acros 100? Isn't BW400CN a C-41 film? I seem to recall people feeling that those films (color neg) actually do quite will if you rate them lower. Less grain, still get good tones. Why not just rate BW400CN at 200 instead of 400? Daniel B. D. Colen wrote: > If 100 iso is high enough, Ken, go for it - but expect a smoother, > less contrasty look than Tri-X... > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of Kenneth Frazier > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:34 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: RE: [Leica] Fuji Neopan Acros 100? > > > bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) wrote: > > >>When shooting film it was my >>standard film for bright sunlight. Standard processing, and I scanned >>it. No problems scanning. I liked it. Very fine grain. Nice tonality. > > > Thanks, B. D. > > My reason for asking, I neglected to mention, is that Monday and > Tuesday I'm shooting outside and will be able to use a slower speed > film....slower than my usual BW400CN. > > Ken > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information