[Leica] PAW 10 Lee Hermann

[richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)]

I said this before, but looking thru the hundreds of sets of photos I have 
taken in the last 15 years, my biggest regret is that there are several 
rolls taken on Kodak Gold 200 of our first born when she was 2-3 years old. 
The grain the size of eyeballs. May be we got a bad batch. May be the 
processor screws it up. I don't know....

p.s. your pics are fine.

At 09:57 PM 3/12/2005, lkhermann wrote:
>Dear Richard,
>         Thanks for looking at the photos or at least commenting.  I think 
> that people are giving gold 200 a bum rap.  I have seen very large blow 
> ups of my negatives of aerial photos which held together very well to 
> almost mural size.  These were used at a public meeting and were far 
> bigger than any thing I have ever done.  I am certain that the negatives 
> were scanned to a much higher resolution than any of my PAWs have 
> been.  I also believe that the gold 200 is certainly a better film than 
> any available to HCB in the time of his greatest production.  You have to 
> compare it to superXX etc and not ASA 10 Kodachrome.
>Lee
>

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)