Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Bob, I wasn't aware of the Romantic Era heritage although I do appreciate the association. For me it was the joy of seeing something, imagining how it could be used, and then finding out I could make it happen. Of course there's no escaping the images from the early 20th century - they are an indelible part of western culture - but they are deep in the background for me because I have so much missing in my own artistic education. So I suppose i was, in some way, doing what you suggest, although without knowing the elements to which I was responding. In another thread there was a conversation about one of the boons of digital photography being experimentation. Certainly I found it easier to experiment when, after I had made the shots, I could look through the previews and see if I was close to what I had imagined. That's important to me. Thanks for sharing your thoughts about the image. I appreciate it. As I did all the others. Adam On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:17:16 EST, Afterswift@aol.com <Afterswift@aol.com> wrote: > > In a message dated 3/9/05 4:38:08 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: > > > http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2005/03/08/_L3U0657.jpg > > > -------------------------------- > My goodness, Adam, are we back to the romantic era of at the turn of the > 20th > century? The most unfilmlike days when photographers tried to imitate avant > garde painting or pictorialism. But what I like in your image is the fact > that > you didn't use PS to get the effect. You found it in the field -- in that > lobby. So you were true to Leica tradition. > > Bob > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >