Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: Ansel Adams
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Mon Mar 7 10:21:19 2005
References: <200503070945.AA2726887530@cshore.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0503071614130.20131@hedvig.uio.no>

Ansel was just luck he had to stand so far back from Half-dome - if he
had been right up under it he would have been hit by many a climbers
"blue bags".

I'll leave it at that.


Dave


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:14:37 +0100 (MET), Daniel Ridings
<daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> wrote:
> Yeah, well, we better not go there.
> 
> In the cycle of time, things tend to balance out and take care of
> themselves.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, dnygr wrote:
> 
> > Dan is right to point out that the environment gets short shrift by many 
> > in power, but that does not lessen Ansel Adams. The poor are getting 
> > short shrift as well.
> >
> > Doug Nygren
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>

Replies: Reply from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] RE: Ansel Adams)
In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (dnygr) ([Leica] RE: Ansel Adams)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] RE: Ansel Adams)