Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!
From: jcb at visualimpressions.com (JCB)
Date: Sun Mar 6 12:25:12 2005
References: <004201c5226e$f14a9130$6501a8c0@hal> <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBGEHHHGAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

Hear hear!

JB


At 11:17 AM 3/6/2005, Phong wrote:


>I do not agree with B.D. and you.
>Post-exposure cropping is an important tool and I do not
>understand why some people are so adamant in not using it.
>
>Please understand that composition is extremely important
>for my own photography.  In many, many instances, the placement
>of graphical elements in the image is what makes or breaks a photo
>for me.   So I am not cavalier about composition at all.
>And yet there are many reasons why I prefer to crop.
>
>For one, Leica M framing is only so accurate.   For another,
>unless I shoot slides, (and even then !), the film is never the end
>but  an intermediate step toward the final product, whose
>proportions may not be the same as the film.   And there might be
>reasons that I choose in advance to crop later (do not want to move
>around too much as not to disturb the subject).  Finally, there is
>a lot of creativity in the post-exposure processings that I enjoy,
>including cropping.
>
>I disagree with Sonny on his choice of words; I would call it
>being unnecessarily dogmatic rather than laziness.
>
>Interestingly enough there are plenty of cooks, good and bad,
>that are also unnecessary dogmatic about their methods.
>It's just me, but I rather not be dogmatic about things like
>to crop or not.
>
>Regards,
>
>- Phong


In reply to: Message from chandos at cox.net (Chandos Michael Brown) ([Leica] was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
Message from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)