Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suppose that is fair enough. Of course, on a list like this we have folks who tend to notice details. ; -) Frank On Mar 4, 2005, at 1:16 PM, mcintyre@ca.inter.net wrote: > Indeed they do, and sometimes get into problems when they don't pay > attention to the > details! I for a > commercial printer, and quite often we point out images that have been > flipped where > letters, numbers > and other details are obviously wrong! But designers do like to have a > flow to their > visual layout and > will take liberties. > > Here is the image in question from the pottery barn. > > http://ww2.potterybarn.com/cat/pip.cfm? > src=shpcfurbeddrs%7Crshop%2Fshpcfurocc%7Crshop% > 2Fthmafur%7Ccthmnft%7Cnshop%7Crgift%5Cfthm%2Fshpcfur% > 7Crshop&pkey=cfurbeddrs&gids=p5048 > > >> Often editors prefer a shot reversed. An example is they may want a >> person >> "looking into" the center of a magazine rather than out towards the >> edge of >> the magazine. Product shot perspective, etc. I think it's an "artsy" >> thing >> >> "Frank F. Farmer" wrote: >> >>> I suppose you could. But wouldn't that require and affirmative >>> effort? >>> Not the sort of thing that would happen on accident. I'm asking, I >>> don't know. >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> On Mar 3, 2005, at 12:03 PM, islaymalt wrote: >>> >>>> Couldn't you just flip a digital shot in photoshop? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >