Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Craig, (and Roger), Because it's big, heavy and slow..., and because the optical quality can't live in the same room with the primes, namely 28/2 ASPH, 35/2 ASPH and 50/1.4 ASPH? By reputation, the Tri-Elmar is a bit problematic mechanically too, is it not? Example: Last chance I had to shoot anything interesting was in January on the way back to New Jersey from Richmond, Virginia. Had a meeting with a retired press photographer at the Air & Space Museum at Dulles. He had covered the Opening Day and we were both expecting a lot more light in there than there was. (Lately they don't appear to pay their electric bill! :-) In my "travel bag" were an MP .58 and 35/2 ASPH loaded with Supra 800 Pro from an evening out in a restaurant the night before, an M5 and 50/1.4 ASPH loaded with Portra VC 400 and an M7 and 28/2 ASPH loaded with Portra VC 400. We could only meet for an hour because he had theatre plans and I was due in Annapolis for dinner. Must get back there some day properly prepared... In the short time we were there, between the three bodies, but mainly the MP due to the cave-like lighting conditions, I shot 40 frames, mostly wide open, never stopped down more than f2.8. Half the shots were acceptable or better. Had about eight solid hits, five of which are stunning, two of which have been sold. Obviously, you have to do what works for you... William At 11:07 AM 03/03/2005 -0800, you wrote: >I have bought and sold 3 M6TTL's and an M7. I regret selling the first M6. >I now use only one MP. Might get a back-up M6 but I don't need more bodies >for different lenses because the lenses that get the most use are the 28, >35, and 50 on my Tri-Elmar. I'm surprised there aren't more of you doing >the same. > >Craig