Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Shots in the Met
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Sat Feb 26 06:42:30 2005
References: <013101c51b82$752821f0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

B.D. -

>The first one should have been shot from the left (right?) with the
>woman on the phone in the foreground and the statue behind her.

That's the picture you would have taken.  I posted the one I wanted 
to take. :-))

What we have here is a failure to communicate. :-))))

What I thought might be seen in this picture

http://gallery.leica-users.org/GATES/4_13_0024_2_LF

was a young boy and an woman communicating only through their cell 
phones despite the fact that they are only a few feet away from one 
another, their backs to one another, and separated by a rather 
despairing cold bronze statue.  In words, I was trying to say 
something about strained communication.

Obviously, that didn't come across, so something's missing.  It must 
need something more to connect the two together, but damned if I know 
what it is at this point.

>I like
>the second; I just wish I knew what was in the young woman's hand. And
>for whatever it's worth - get rid of those damn copyright notices; they
>really detract from the photos. :-)


You're right about the notices.  Those photos were posted elsewhere 
initially.

Thanks for the comments, in any case.   It's been frustrating of late 
to post photos here, get 60-100 hits on each within a few hours and 
get almost nothing back from the folks who looked.  I've taken refuge 
in the hit counters.  They at least give me some idea of where I've 
managed to catch an eye.

I understand the lack of reaction in one sense.  There are some 
photos here that are so damned good I don't know what to say, so I 
don't respond at all.  There are others that leave me so cold I don't 
know what to say either.

When people do respond, with even a sentence or two, it inevitably 
calls my attention to some element of a photo that I didn't know was 
there, for better or worse, that's a big help, and is appreciated.

Come to think of it, maybe this lack of response is what the picture 
is all about anyway.

End of rant.  :-)

Thanks again.

P.S.  I'm told that putting periods at the end of URLs upsets some 
mailers.  I'll try to leave them off from now on.  Emoticons, no 
periods at the end of sentences - where will it all end?  ;-)

Regards,

Dick
Boston MA

>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Richard S. Taylor
>Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:21 PM
>To: lug@leica-users.org
>Subject: [Leica] Shots in the Met
>
>
>Here are two more shots from my visit to the Metropolitan Museum of
>Art last weekend.  The first is a more tightly cropped version of one
>I posted earlier this week.  I think the cropping helps focus the eye
>on the subjects better.
>
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/GATES/4_13_0024_2_LF
>
>
>The second is a variation on the theme.
>
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/GATES/4_9_0028_LF
>
>Comments encouraged as always.  Thanks.
>--
>Regards,
>
>Dick
>Boston MA
>_______________________________________________


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Shots in the Met)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Shots in the Met)