Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think in B.D.'s case, it's more like man bites camera. S. Dimitrov On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > On 2/22/05 5:17 AM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> typed: > >> Luis, I would suggest that Leica cannot survive independently because >> it >> has for some time been run by people who have no competency in running >> late 20th, early 21st century businesses. The only way it can possibly >> "survive" is if another company - Cosina? Canon? - buys it, probably >> to >> come out with a digital rangefinder with an M lens mount which it will >> badge Leica, and perhaps to keep the M7 manufacturing going. I believe >> it's safe to predict that who ever takes over Leica will do away with >> all the special order camera nonsense, and will probably kill off the >> MP. >> > Actually B.D. you might keep in mind that as this is the Leica Users > Group > this is a group of people who use Leicas. > The PRODUCT that this famously bad management group you keep harping > about > endlessly MAKES NOW. It is their current or recent PRODUCT. > Which they deserve credit for. > Most of us are into the new stuff. The new "product". > The same basic management and certainly the company that since I > started > getting into Leica 12 years ago come out with the revolutionary > 24 ASPH > 21 ASPH > 35 Summicron and Summilux both ASPH. > 50 Summilux ASPH and collapsible Elmar, my next lens probably,. > 90 Elmarit and APO ASPH Summicron and collapsible macro. > 135 3.4 Telyt APO > The m7 and Mp and the m6 TTL. > Much of this I've bought into and used since it's come out in the last > twelve years I've been getting more and more into Leica. > As you'd think others on this list might also be doing. > > And all kinds of R stuff which I know less about. > > No company in the world have come up with products year after year > which > have so consistently consumed my funds and time than Leica. > Yes my Leicas are worth a bit more than what I paid for my used 94 > Volvo > station wagon. > Not my house though. I guess my first and top devotion goes to the > house > making industry. I should just the House Users Group. That's where my > money > is. > > So there is nothing amazing about my appreciation for Leica the > company or > management. > I use the products the company has come out with over the past dozen > years. > > And it's not so amazing that as a NON Leica user, BD you'd NOT think so > highly of them. Even be HIGHLY CRITICAL of them. > But it's not exactly "MAN BITES DOG". > The only thing amazing to me is why you are here feeling the need to > continually hit us with this nasty negative line. You just never run > out of > hot air! > > Leica is down and gasping now. > Me I hate to see it being kicked while it's down here by people who > never > liked it to begin with. > Its just too obvious. > But criticized by those who have a real interest in it. > A real positive interest in it. > To me that's real conversation. > Lets hear some real critical cutting insight by someone who's made a > commitment to Leica use. > That's more "MAN BITES DOG". Or at least good conversation. > > I think instead of people cavalierly making jokes about whose going to > buy > Leica, Michel Jackson or Walt Disney some of us do something positive > like a > friend of mine just did yesterday. > Buy a Leica. > Actually he bought a collapsible 90. I may do the same. > > The news is that Leica is in very deep trouble and might go under. > Not that they PROBABLY will go under. > And not that they're GOING to go under for sure. > > You would think the Leica Users Group would be behind Leica. > > > Mark Rabiner > Photography > Portland Oregon > http://rabinergroup.com/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Slobodan Dimitrov Photography