Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Although I tend to agree with B. D. I think his model T analogy is completely off base. The R8/9 will continue to be able to produce very fine images using film even if the digital back goes belly up. Of course it's a risk at this point because the software updates etc have to come from SOMEWHERE and someone has to pay for them. I doubt if there will be an open source movement to rescue it! <grin> Adam On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:30:36 -0500, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote: > Great, Rick. Pay $4K for digital because you want to shoot digital and > Leica, and then have it go belly up and be told, 'well, it's backwards > compatible, you can always shoot film.' Sounds allot like telling > someone who bought a model T they could always use a horse to pull it if > the engine died. :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Rick Dykstra > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:24 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR dead end? > > Certainly food for thought. One thought is, the DMR truly represents > Leica's commitment to backwards compatibility. If the manufacturer > goes completely tits up, just use film! Try that with a digital from > Canikonoltashikatax! Try saying Canikonoltashikatax, late at night. > :-( > > Rick. > > On 22/02/2005, at 7:12 PM, David Teo wrote: > > > Hi > > > > To me, the DMR is definitely a dead end, factoring in the recent bad > > financial state of Leica. > > > > Buying a DMR is not the same as buying a new MP today, the latter > > being almost guaranteed to work for decades to come, dust in > > viewfinder not withstanding :) Even if Leica goes belly up, there's > > always DAG or Sherry to give that MP the overhaul it needs to get it > > working for the next decade or so. Who is going to repair your DMR or > > service it if Leica goes bust tomorrow? It doesn't help that Leica's > > history with electronics is suspect at best. Where are you going to > > get the new firmware updates from? > > > > All of Leica's current digital offerings are made by Panasonic. With > > the DMR, it is Imacon and Kodak. What if that relationship sours? You > > will be left with no more improvements to the DMR. Look at Nikon - > > their sensors come from Sony and they are unable to produce updated > > versions of their aging D100 nor offer a higher megapixel count D2h. > > This is very likely a sensor availability problem. Canon, which has > > inhouse R&D work on their own sensors, is able to produce 4 different > > sensors within the span of a single year for each of their DSLRs. > > > > All it takes is for Imacon to pull the plug and Leica will be left > > with no digital future. The future doesn't look too bright. And the > > continual delay of the release of the DMR is not confidence inspiring. > > > > Btw I'm just wondering, is DAG or Sherry or any of the reputed Leica > > repair persons training up new apprentices? This would be a good time > > I think, to train up a new generation of camera repair people > > specializing in Leica equipment. Provided of course, with the highly > > educated youngsters today, there are still some of them willing to > > take up the job :) > > > > ---------- > > David Teo > > > > > > On 22-Feb-05, at AM 02:06, B. D. Colen wrote: > > > >> Right...So a brand spanking new, state-of-today's-art, high speed, 8 > >> mpg > >> autofocus DSLR built for service in Iraq and Afganistan, with a 1.3 > >> magnification factor - oh, that will take R lenses - from a very > >> healthy > >> manufacturer for under $4K, v. a $4K+ digital BACK for a manual SLR > >> from > >> a manufacturer who may not be around tomorrow? Buy up Ms and Rs while > >> you can? Sure. But DMR? That makes a great deal of sense - only to > >> someone with Red Dots where their eyes, heart, and brain are supposed > > >> to > >> be. ;-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >