Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: FS: Leitz/Leica 350mm f/4.8 Telyt-R
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Fri Feb 11 13:07:32 2005

Here in the LUG we have referred to completed lenses as "glass" ( I think I
started that bad habit).  We have also referred to APO lenses.  See
description in heavily technical scientific dictionaries if you want to
figure out the techie stuff.

The reference to a single piece of glass as APO ( or Apochromatic) can be
correct, but in all the references I have seen, it refers not to a glass
element, but rather to an optical chain ( which may be a single element, but
may have and usually does have more elements.)  It is a complete optical
chain.

I think Frank D is right.  Referring to an optical component as APO is
incorrect.  It does not mean it was not done, but it is incorrect.

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net


Please point me in the direction of some explanation of what "APO"
glass is then, if you know a url. I have heard of APO as an overall
complete lens design specification many times but I have no knowledge
that there is a particular APO glass.
Frank



In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: Re: FS: Leitz/Leica 350mm f/4.8 Telyt-R)