Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agee. I asked the same question to the list few years back. Many gave me a good advice and I ended up getting lux ASPH. I never regretted my decision. Isaku >From: Tarek Charara <tarek.charara@pix-that-stimulate.com> >Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux? >Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:51:34 +0100 > >Take the fastest lenses you can afford, you'll probably never regret >it! > >Tarek > >Le 10 f?r. 2005, ?22:39, Didier Ludwig a ?rit : > >>It's still an extra stop more, if you use the same emulsions with a >>'lux'! >> >>Myself, I went for a 'lux' (75mm, a 'cron' (50mm) and a Voigtlander >>Ultron (35mm). >>Didier >> >> >>>With modern emulsions, TMY, TMZ, Portra 800, is the extra stop of >>>the Summilux worth the weight and added cost? >>>I love the results with my 50 and 90 Summicron's and am trying to >>>decide which 35mm to round out my bag. > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information