Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Puppy Pics (geez) (recant)
From: SonC at (
Date: Thu Feb 10 06:51:53 2005


I must recant my statement below.  The dog is not ugly, it is only the  
photography that makes it seem so.
In a message dated 2/10/2005 8:08:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, writes:

In a  message dated 2/10/2005 5:30:06 A.M. Central Standard Time, writes:

Non  Leica, and I didn't  take them, but who cares :-)
Well, I care.  Sorry, but the few shots I  sampled are not worth  looking 
This list is already  cluttered, but for the life of me I  cannot fathom why 
you posted  this set of bad pictures of an ugly dog.

I know it is uncharacteristic  of me to be so blunt these days, but geez. If 
you want to post crap,  get yourself a blog.

Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest  continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
?galit?, libert?,   crawfish

Replies: Reply from richard-lists at (Richard) ([Leica] OT: Puppy Pics (geez) (recant))