Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Absolutely BD, In some ways, and for these particular images I prefer this "look" , though in general you are right ... Though not always looking for a clearer view of what's behind, by increasing the dof...actually, I do love the look of Tri X... The technical advantage of a C41 film is 1) easy development, by others, in an hour, and 2)....Digital Ice that reduces dust and scratchs virtually to zero....but that's a marriage of convenience. In general, the look of silver based film, that of many of my favorite photographers, and including your own images in that medium...is a look that I admire, and would love to achieve... Steve B. D. Colen wrote: > That's why Tri-X has so much latitude - Tri-X and 800 and your 50 or 35 > Summilux would have given you the scene without that gauzy, out of focus > look - but if you like the guazy, out-of-focus look, then the Noct at f1 > was the right lens...:-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Steve Barbour > Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:41 PM > To: LUG > Subject: [Leica] latest paw... > > > taken in the hospital.... > > > > http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-79434.html > > > M7 Noctilux at f1 (sorry BD, it was dark... > :-) ) on BW400CN... > > > your comments are always appreciated... > > > Steve > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >