Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D., When I said no good for action is that I am use to a DSLR with auto focusing and 11 focus points. This is a big shift in the usage department. If I could have rented the camera before hand I would of. The resale value of these items makes this not such a throw away purchase. The point about shooting action is that I have to get use to zone focusing again and adjust my shooting technique A lot of times I need a good 80-300 focal length when shooting sports or action shots as the parents are not always allowed so close. My original aim in buying this camera was to have a carry with me all the time camera and for travel. By your comment I hoped I did not do to bad my first try. Thanks, Chris On Jan 28, 2005, at 7:37 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > What this inquiring mind wants to know is why someone with no real > experience using a rangefinder goes out and buys a $3K digital > rangefinder that has gotten so-so reviews at best, along with three- > count 'em - three Leica lenses? If I hadn't seen these photos I'd swear > this was a troll. ;-) > > And as to the camera - or rangefinders - being lousy for shooting > action > - no 10, with the two kids frozen in mid-air and blurred instructor > belies that - as does the work of, oh, David Douglas Duncan, HCB, > Robert > Capa, Larry Burrows, Henri Huet, to name just a few. ;-) >