Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D.,
When I said no good for action is that I am use to a DSLR with auto
focusing and 11 focus points. This is a big shift in the usage
department. If I could have rented the camera before hand I would of.
The resale value of these items makes this not such a throw away
purchase.
The point about shooting action is that I have to get use to zone
focusing again and adjust my shooting technique A lot of times I need a
good 80-300 focal length when shooting sports or action shots as the
parents are not always allowed so close.
My original aim in buying this camera was to have a carry with me all
the time camera and for travel.
By your comment I hoped I did not do to bad my first try.
Thanks,
Chris
On Jan 28, 2005, at 7:37 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:
> What this inquiring mind wants to know is why someone with no real
> experience using a rangefinder goes out and buys a $3K digital
> rangefinder that has gotten so-so reviews at best, along with three-
> count 'em - three Leica lenses? If I hadn't seen these photos I'd swear
> this was a troll. ;-)
>
> And as to the camera - or rangefinders - being lousy for shooting
> action
> - no 10, with the two kids frozen in mid-air and blurred instructor
> belies that - as does the work of, oh, David Douglas Duncan, HCB,
> Robert
> Capa, Larry Burrows, Henri Huet, to name just a few. ;-)
>