Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] NOW DIGITAL CHARGES.
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Sun Jan 23 15:17:21 2005
References: <15b.4901be22.2f24c16b@aol.com> <002101c50159$3c432e40$833b6d18@ted> <6.1.2.0.2.20050123132820.01f806a0@mail.comporium.net> <000b01c5019f$55417c30$833b6d18@ted>

Well if you use your own inkjet printer ink you need to make sure you
charge for a substance that is more expensive than oil and more
expensive than gold.


Dave

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:00:28 -0800, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Tina Manley said:
> >
> > Unless you charge them for all of the digital processing!  Most clients
> > have no idea what to do with a RAW digital file.  All of the time and
> > knowledge spent converting that into something that is printable should 
> > be
> > charged as a separate item just like film processing used to be.  
> > Creative
> > ways to list the charges are discussed on the ProPhoto lists.<<<<<<<<
> 
> Hi Tina,
> As i'm learning from of my Canadian photographer friends. I sometimes add
> creative processing! ;-) And they don't have a clue what we mean so it gets
> paid as part of the overall costs.
> 
> ted
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] NOW DIGITAL CHARGES.)
In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] Doomed whatever)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Doomed whatever)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Doomed whatever)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] NOW DIGITAL CHARGES.)