Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Interesting
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Tue Jan 18 10:57:42 2005
References: <011820050527.28466.41EC9E55000B6F4D00006F322200745672040C02019C990E04@comcast.net> <B6CA47A2-6916-11D9-90AC-000D933F4332@earthlink.net> <41ED5A9D.4020607@triad.rr.com>

On Jan 18, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Dan Post wrote:

> Feli-
> Actually, the item that caught my eye was that the lens was NOT 
> stabilised! It was the sensor!
> The Minds at Minolta might have something! It seems silly to load a 
> lens with all sorts of hardware to move heavy glass elements when a 
> simpler system to move a lightweight sensor would be more energy 
> efficient and might operate more quickly.
> The downside is whether the platform for the sensor might be more 
> susceptible to impact damage, even from a minor 'bump'.
> Also- the system allows the use of older lenses and still lets one 
> have the advantage of stabilization.
> Interesting indeed!
> Dan

It looks like a good idea, although the report says that it works best 
with shorter
lenses (wide-100mm or 180mm). But still, a 2 stop advantage straight 
out of the box,
with any lens you can mount. Pretty neat.


feli


________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


In reply to: Message from mcyclwritr at comcast.net (mcyclwritr@comcast.net) ([Leica] A couple Noctilux images from New Year's Eve.)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Interesting)
Message from dpost at triad.rr.com (Dan Post) ([Leica] Interesting)