Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]PMFJI here but the loss of Merc quality was a conscious management decision. Merc new that other makers were selling cars which were much less well made in an engineering sense but which had managed to get a very high quality image with customers by good marketing. This is much more profitable and they wanted to join in but they blew it. It is surprising what poorly engineered cr*p the car buying public will be loyal to as long as it is reliable but they failed here, the one thing they could not afford to let slip - the reliability - was one of the casualties of their change of emphasis. Sad Frank On 15 Jan, 2005, at 06:43, mcyclwritr@comcast.net wrote: > Remember how the world fawned over German automotive engineering and > build quality a few decades ago? Mercedes' reliability ratings now > reside with toilet bowl scum on the J.D. Power list. Why? Poorly > controlled, if not utterly out-of-control, labor costs. Lousy work > ethic. Could outside suppliers have been contracted to offset high > salaries and spotty output?