Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] speaking of size of that 90/2AA vs. Sonnar 85/2...
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Thu Jan 13 17:03:42 2005
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050112161748.0567d0e0@192.168.100.42>
 

> Isn't the 90/2 R lens MUCH smaller than the 90/2AA M lens? How did Leica 
> do that? On the other end of the spectrum, the Canon 85/1.4 seems to dwarf 
> all my Leica lenses combined :-) so who knows...
>
>FWIW my excellent AF Nikkor 85 1.4 with it,s hood was way bigger then the 
>90 AAS as well .Very fast focus on the F5 though still miss it on occasion.
best simon jessurun,amsterdam the netherlands
Replies: Reply from mcintyre at ca.inter.net (Jim McIntyre) ([Leica] Starting year three PAW on a cool note)
 In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] speaking of size of that 90/2AA vs. Sonnar 85/2...)