Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 1/12/05 8:02:05 PM, fotabug@comcast.net writes: > Just a few thoughts on getting to know the aesthetics of creative > photography.? It isn't a bad influence, it becomes part of good habits. > Result?? The work of everyone of us is different and very personal. > ---------------------------------- Since a scene suggests an idea; and the idea suggests the technique which makes that idea manifest, I always try to find the idea in the print as a viewer. Idea and technique come together in composition to my mind. The composition, therefore, is where the quality of a true photograph can be found. Not in the framing. Sometimes s subject overawes a photographer to the point where the only idea he has is the reaction to put that dramatic image on film or pixel. Sorry, but were I judging prints those alluring shots would get my appreciation but not my vote. I would seek those images which speak to me with the mind of the photographer. If an image resurrects the insight of the original impression of the photographer, that print is successful. But that insight must be powerful and have an esthetic dimension if art is present. I'm not referring here to photojournalism or studio work; although portraiture -- particularly the environmental sort -- may be another matter. What I look for: Relationships the bind the elements in the scene in such a way that they reveal the message the photographer recognized. Techniques most commonly used are scale, perspective, contrast, directionality, color or contrast, motion. In short, a photographer must know his stuff and be able to parse complexity fast and think on his or her feet. Now you know why I don't shoot very many frames. The only danger of the idea-oriented approach to photography is that the photographer could lust after illusions: try to embrace an idea whose elements aren't there. A painter has no such problem. Which is why field art photography isn't for the impatient, lazy or the faint-hearted. Bob