Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 13/1/05 3:38 am, Bill Marshall at billgem@hotmail.com wrote: > Richard said that he would consider it if it were "significantly smaller > than the 90/2.8AA." Given that, this is not the lens for him. The 85/2 is > longer & heavier than the 90/2AA and takes a bigger filter. Both the Leica APO Summicron M 90/2.0 ASPH and the forthcoming Zeiss Sonnar 85/2.0 ZM take 55mm filters. The Zeiss Distagon 15/2.8 ZM takes 72mm filters. The Distagon is the fatter but shorter lens, and also lighter (370g) than the Sonnar (450g) The APO Summicron M 90/2.0 ASPH is heavier still at 500g. The Sonnar is the longer lens though at 83mm, whereas the APO Summicron is slightly shorter at 78mm. Joseph