Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The micropirsm works well for me with 35mm and 28mm lenses, but I agree that the split-image gives more certainty with wider lenses than that (but I don't have any wider lenses than 28 for my SL). > > Probably depends on what lenses and types of photos you prefer. Most of > my > photos are at 280mm and longer of subjects without any linear shapes. I > prefer the microprism screen and I even had my SL2 changed to the > microprism > screen (as I understand it this camera has the last SL2 microprism screen > that Solms had). If I were more intersted in architecture with wide-angle > lenses then split-image would be my choice. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >