Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BESSA R3A or M7
From: jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jan 8 10:06:53 2005
References: <BAY101-F424831A70521BEB00BBB1BAB950@phx.gbl> <BE05265A.1D695%telyt@earthlink.net> <76ba89b30501080759438c67da@mail.gmail.com> <D439D593-619D-11D9-A6F6-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

I guess we'll have to compare the Zeiss lineup to Elmars. ;-)


On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:50:48 -0700, John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> wrote:
>  Aren't we comparing apples and oranges here? Zeiss is only offering
> one high speed lens (85/2). I would be surprised if Zeiss couldn't
> design an f/2 or f/2.8 lens that could at least equal Leica's faster --
> and thus a heck of a lot harder to design -- offerings. If there were
> f1.4 50s and 35s, then I would be paying attention. If there were an
> f/2 25 or 21, then I would be ordering.
> 
> John Collier
> 
> On Jan 8, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> 
> > Zeiss has taken the remarkable stand in stating (in Q&A fashion) that
> > it believes that the lenses will outperform those already on the
> > market (I assume that they were talking about Leica et al). That's a
> > pretty big statement to back up.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
In reply to: Message from billgem at hotmail.com (Bill Marshall) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
Message from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)