Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Sonny has it right here, folks. Posting a good picture every week is an admirable, entertaining exercise. It may even be the best way to share. However, posting 52 pictures at one-week intervals is clearly a different exercise than the more rigid picture-a-week effort. Picture-a-week requires more brutal editing on really good weeks and a bit of blushing on those weeks that don't go as well. Both are good things, but should not be confused. Have fun, Ric Carter Garner, NC > In a message dated 1/5/2005 6:16:59 PM Central Standard Time, > firkin@balhpl01.ncable.net.au writes: > > Richard, > Don't give up. Not every PAW is according to Kyle. This and the FOM2 > projects are designed to encourage the use of the Leicas (it is a Leica > USERS group ;-) ) but its flexible. Put images up on your PAW which may > interest others, or you hope to have reviewed. It is pointless putting > up > rubbish JUST because it was taken that week. Sonny must be grumpy ;-) > > > > > Actually, I am in a pretty good mood. As I said to Dick, I encourage > posting. I wish everyone did. It is just that the idea of a picture > a week is like > any other exercise regimen. Either you do it, or you don't. > > A catholic who don't believe in the Pope's infallibility is called an > Anglican or Episcopalian. Doesn't make you a bad person. Just makes > you a catholic > lower case. You are still a posting photographer if you don't do a > PAW, just > a lower case photographer! > > Last year, GeeBee chose not to do a PAW, and probably posted more > shots than > anyone. It is not a criticism, just a definition of terms. > > Regards, > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > Natchitoches, Louisiana > Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane > ?galit?, libert?, crawfish