Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]nelson chan wrote: > Hello Fellow Lugger, > > Happy New Year!! > > The NPH is giving me headache, almost all my prints came out underexposed > (I think). color is lifeless and prints are generally grainy. Tried > shooting at asa 320 but still prints came out lousy. I don't know if it is > the lab or the film I bought is defective. Should I set it at asa 250? I > have excellent results with Fuji NPS 160 and Kodak 160 Portra 160. Thanks > in advance. > > Regards, > > > Nelson > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Hi Nelson, I use nph in both 35mm and MF. I always expose at 400 and never have a problem. The printing however is very important. It can make or break your pictures. Might have been a batch out of spec. Michiel Fokkema