Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica MP Classic
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Tue Dec 21 08:31:35 2004
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNEEECAOAB.red735i@earthlink.net>

There are many people who would consider paying $2500 for a 50mm lens, or
$2700 for a plain Jane MP or M7 to be equally foolish.    $2000 for a 50
year old M3?   That's considered sane?

Different strokes for different folks.

-dan c.

At 10:52 AM 21-12-04 -0500, B. D. Colen wrote:
>These days you could get a mint-, if not mint M3 for under $2K - Why not
>by the real, real thing? :-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Frank Filippone
>Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 10:40 AM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica MP Classic
>
>
>Would it be cheaper to buy a real, original issue,  MP then this thing?
>
>There is no accounting for taste.... and apparently for man's stupidity.
>( PT Barnum?)
>
>Frank Filippone
>red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Leica MP Classic)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica MP Classic)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Leica MP Classic)