Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Film AND Digital?
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Sun Dec 5 11:03:36 2004
References: <410-220041205161725131@earthlink.net>

Jim,

Though I found at least one "reasonably good" mass scanning lab in 
Switzerland, it comes too expensive with the time (SFR10/$8 a roll).

Here is a unmanipulated, uncropped scan from the CD
(Kodak TN400, M6, 2.5/35mm Voigtlander Color Skopar Pancake II)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/11-2004/028_32?full=1

But, for the price of scanning 30-35 rolls (thats half a year for me), 
there are film scanners that are beating this quality.

The one I intend to buy is known in Europe under different labels like 
Reflecta ProScan 3600 or Mediax WorkScan 3600, in the USA under Microtek 
Filmscan 3600 and maybe other names. It takes entire filmrolls (max. 40 
pictures) at one time, which probably suits best for those who are 
self-processing their films.

Optical resolution is effective 3600 dpi, max. density is 3.6, colors 
3x12/36bit, Firewire, USB, Mac/PC. The scanner is said to outperform a 
Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Scan Dual IV or Canon CanoScan FS4000US easily in 
quality and handling (but not in scanning speed as they're all slow on hi 
res scans).

Price is about 250EUR incl. the Silverline AI 6 software. The 3600 has no 
ICE (hardware dust removing system, but if you scan your rolls immediately 
after processing and drying, dust shouldn't be a problem). The newer 4000 
has ICE and an IT8-Target color calibration slide (560EUR).

Didier


>>Anyone had any good experiences with mass market scanning of film?
>>Jim

>I thought the same as you, but there's a too big difference in loss of
>quality. Saludos,
>Luis

In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at earthlink.net (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Film AND Digital?)