Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And that, Dan, is - as you know - the point. And they'd have done "no worse" for a fraction of the cost. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Dan C Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:26 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital back I don't think most browsers are setup to display TIFFs the same way they display JPGs or GIFs. In my case, Apple's Quicktime started up and displayed the image when I loaded the image into Internet Explorer. And I was able to save it to my harddrive, but I can't recall what I did. I think when I right clicked on it, there was an option, "save target as", which worked. In my opinion, the image did look very good at first glance, but I don't think any of the current crop of 6mp DSLRs (for example, the new Minolta 7D) would have done any worse. -dan c. At 10:03 AM 24-11-04 -0500, B. D. Colen wrote: >So I looked at the image - the urban scene - someone pointed to as an >example of how good the digital back is. > >1 - Pardon my obvious lack of understanding, but what is it that >distinguishes this tourist snap shot from any other tourist snap shot >taken with any 3mgp digital point and shoot? > >2 - Perhaps there's something wrong with my computer or browser, but >when I right-click on the image, in order to get information about it >and save it to my desktop as a tiff, nothing comes up, leading me to >believe that Leica doesn't want this image downloaded and examined >carefully in Photoshop. Am I missing something here? > >B.D. > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information