Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Sun Nov 21 18:34:46 2004
References: <BDC68D10.AC9E%mark@rabinergroup.com>

On Nov 21, 2004, at 6:21 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> Very soon they're all going to figure out just how big the file sizes 
> really
> have to be which is not all that big for PJ and lots of other work and 
> the
> competition won't be for file size any more but QUALITY!
>
> Sure there will be cameras with APS-c large file sizes, full frame 
> 24x36
> CCD's and medium and large format CCD's which blur together for the
> landscape photographers and others who need files that size. But how 
> many
> really do? How many applications and markets?
> A definite but not overwhelming segment.
>
> Perhaps less than what used medium and large format film but perhaps 
> not.
> Now its been reduced to a kind of crude pissing contest.
>
> To win undecided voters.


I would be very happy with a 10-12MP full frame camera.
Manageable file sizes, DOF of a 135, low noise at high ASA, due
to the large size of individual receptors. I really don't need 20MP
for what I do...

feli

_______________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                    2 + 2 = 4                     
www.elanphotos.com



Replies: Reply from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Reply from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)