Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] phase one literature
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Tue Nov 9 16:29:43 2004
References: <4591636.1100036804931.JavaMail.root@scooter.psp.pas.earthlink.net><6.1.2.0.2.20041109171908.01e8ea70@mail.comporium.net> <004101c4c6b3$39ab26a0$4649c33e@sypcom>

Forgot to add this in a previous post
http://www.phaseone.com/content/p1digitalbacks/p-series.aspx
where they state their 22mp backs come close to film.

best,simon jessurun

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon with Leica Adapter


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tina Manley" <images@infoave.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 11:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon with Leica Adapter
>
>
>> At 04:46 PM 11/9/2004, you wrote:
>>> > The fair comparison would be a Canon 20D with a Leica/Canon  lens
>>> adaptor against a Leica R9.
>>>Surely you jest.
>>>Doug Herr
>>
>> Why?  Don't knock it if you haven't tried it.  The Leica R lenses on the 
>> Canon digitals are the best of both worlds.  Beautiful, clean, digital 
>> photos with Leica bokeh!
>>
>> Tina
>>
>>
>> Tina Manley, ASMP
>> www.tinamanley.com
>>
>>
> Well  if you buy a new R8 for 1700 US$ and the new digital back for 4500?
> and have no need for fast sports action you would be off a lot cheaper 
> then
> any comparable system I think.
> According this
> http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.summary1.html
> you need about 16 mp for velvia quality and 17 or more for films like
> techpan.
> Cameras with those kind of sensors would be this that costs about 8000 US$
> http://www.dpreview.com/shop/merchants.asp?id=canon_eos1dsmkii
> or this versatile back for about 30 000US$
> http://www.sinarbron.com/sb54sam_new/sysarch.php
>
> The 10 mp Leica back would be enough for most of the applications while 
> the
> 1700 dollar camera can still use the best films.
> And as a bonus you can mount the best lenses ever made which you might
> allready own .
> The more then 2000 US$ difference will buy about 4000 feet of techpan film
> with chemicals i believe
>
> I fail to see the clear advantage for one above the other
> best
> simon jessurun
> amsterdam
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] digital cost analysis (medium format versus digital back))
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 28, Issue 259)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Canon with Leica Adapter)
Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] Canon with Leica Adapter)