Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Summilux vs. Summicron
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon Nov 8 18:23:45 2004

On 11/8/04 3:52 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> typed:

> That used to be the beauty, Vic. But alas, with the dying of film, it is
> no longer true. While Leica equipment may hold its value better than
> most film equipment, it is no longer holding it the way it did even a
> year ago. M6 TTLs purchased for $1995 were selling for about $1450 in
> near mint condition - now they're down to about $1150 - if you're lucky-
> and used M7s, which are now selling for, what, around $2800, are only
> worth approximately 50% of their new priced once they've been driven off
> the lot. So if you're going to invest $2500 in a 50 1.4 lens, you damn
> well better love that lens. ;-)
> 

Film is not dying BD.
I think its great you are on a roll with your Olympus E but lets keep our
perspective on the whole thing.
The film market is being moderated or minimized.
AS there are other technological options which appear more popular for many
uses. 
That's all.

There are 10 billion (last count) cameras out there which all use film to
take pictures and plenty of people who are going to want to use them for
quite some time.

The Nikon F6 is due out soon.
New film cameras are being introduced every day.

And the ones made last year still work.




Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Summilux vs. Summicron)
Reply from mattmorgan1 at mac.com (Matt Morgan) ([Leica] Film dying - was Summilux vs. Summicron)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Summilux vs Summicron)